Cyparium fugitivum, Groll, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.990.2903 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EBB48E32-AFE7-45DE-8985-665968426DB0 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F46F87B6-FFDA-235C-143C-63F8FC1D6C3D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cyparium fugitivum |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cyparium fugitivum sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C00D14F8-67BE-4DBB-8E05-CBF79D7920BC
Figs 1A–D View Fig , 2A, F–G View Fig , 3–5 View Fig View Fig View Fig , 93A–B View Fig
Diagnosis
Body length: 4.40 mm, robust. Black, laterals of pronotum, hypomere and humeral region reddish; very shining. Seven rows of coarse elytral punctures. Lacking microsculpture. Medium lobe strongly curved in lateral view; parameres thin.
Etymology
The species epithet is a Latin word meaning ‘runaway’, because the holotype almost escaped when I tried to collect it.
Material examined
Holotype
BRAZIL • ♂ *; Minas Gerais, Viçosa, Mata da Biologia ; 15 May 2021; E. von Groll and A. Orsetti leg.; “Fungo 44 / Em Agaricales indet. / Dissecado em 15.xii.2022 / HOLOTYPUS ♂ ”; CELC. ( Fig. 3D–E View Fig ).
Description
COLOURATION. Black. Humeral region, laterals of pronotum and hypomeron reddish ( Figs 3A–C, F View Fig , 4A– B View Fig ). Legs dark red-purplish ( Fig. 4C–E View Fig ). Antennomeres I–VI and XI, mouthparts, and tarsi ochreous ( Figs 3F View Fig , 4F–H View Fig ).
HEAD. Frons with dense and coarse punctate; eyes very prominent ( Fig. 3F View Fig ). Antennomeres VIII–XI wide; ratios: I 127/45:II 83/38: III 86/33: IV 63/36:V 55/40:VI 40/46:VII 69/85:VIII 62/93: IX 70/102: X 67/110:XI 103/112 ( Fig. 3G View Fig ).
THORAX. Pronotum coarse and shallowly punctate ( Fig. 4A View Fig ). Hypomeron smooth ( Fig. 4B View Fig ). Scutellum rounded posteriorly ( Fig. 4A View Fig ). Ventral sclerites of thorax smooth and almost glabrous; metaventrite with sparse coarse punctures laterally ( Fig. 4B–C View Fig ). Submesocoxal lines parallel to coxae, with few coarse punctures ( Fig. 4B View Fig ).
WINGS. Elytra rectangular, longer than wide; sutural and basal striae connected; basal stria punctate, reaching almost middle of elytra ( Fig. 3A View Fig ). Seven rows of coarse punctures ( Fig. 3A View Fig ). Epipleuron coarsely punctate ( Fig. 4B View Fig ). Apical spines small ( Fig. 4K View Fig ).
LEGS. Femora sparsely and coarsely punctate ( Fig. 4C–E View Fig ). Meso- and metatibiae curved ( Fig. 4D–E View Fig ), with two large apical spines ( Fig. 4I–J View Fig ).
ABDOMEN. Abdominal ventrite I coarsely punctate, denser laterally; submetacoxal bead with close and coarse punctures ( Figs 3B–C View Fig , 4B View Fig ). Propygidium and pygidium micropunctured and with coarse punctures; disc with strigulate microsculpture anteriorly ( Fig. 4L View Fig ).
Male
Sternite VIII rectangular with a rounded projection ( Fig. 5A View Fig ). Tergite VIII wide and rounded ( Fig. 5B View Fig ). Tergite IX with rectangular-shaped ventral struts ( Fig. 5C View Fig ). Tergite X ( Fig. 5D View Fig ) as long as wide. Sternite IX thicker posteriorly ( Fig. 5E View Fig ).
AEDEAGUS. Strongly sclerotized. Basal bulb large; apical lobe curved in lateral view ( Fig. 5F–H View Fig ); dorsal openings forming an upside-down triangle ( Fig. 5H View Fig ). Parameres thin and short, slightly sinuous ( Fig. 5F–G View Fig ). Internal sac with irregular sclerites ( Fig. 5I–K View Fig ).
MEASUREMENTS (n =1; in mm). TL 4.40, SY 0.37, HW 1.09, IS 0.44, WA 0.27, PL 1.56, PA 1.41, PB 2.75, SL 0.24, SW 0.28, EI 2.70, EL 3.12, EW 1.60, EH 1.09, MSW 0.55, MEL 0.31, MEW 0.13, MB 0.71, MC 1.22, VL 1.00, VL2 0.66. Legs: PrF 1.53, PrT 0.91, MsF 1.34, MsT 1.09, MtF 1.59, MtT 1.56.
Host
Collected from an undetermined mushroom on the border of a field trail ( Fig. 93A–B View Fig ).
Remarks
The humeral reddish area is similar to C. pici von Groll & Lopes-Andrade, 2021 and C. loebli von Groll & Lopes-Andrade, 2021 but differs by the larger size and by the pronotal lateral reddish marks. The pronotum colouration resembles C. anale Reitter, 1880 but the elytral colouration is different. The aedeagus is similar to that of C. pici but it is less robust and the sclerites are in a different shape. The aedeagus is also similar to that of C. lescheni von Groll & Lopes-Andrade, 2021 but it is larger and more robust.
Distribution
Mata da Biologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, campus of Viçosa, state of Minas Gerais, Southeast Brazil ( Fig. 1A–D View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.