Family
LIMIDAE Rafinesque, 1815
View in CoL
Cystia
– Deshayes, 1844-DictUniv4: 562, ex Renier. This name was proposed by Renier (1807), in a work placed on the Official Index (ICZN Opinion 427, 1956b). Its republication by Deshayes, who did not treat is as valid, did not make it available.
bullifera
View in CoL
,
Lima
View in CoL
– Deshayes, 1863: 30-31, pl. 4, figs 9-10. — Type locality: La Réunion. — Type age: Recent. — Current status:
Lima bullifera Deshayes, 1863
View in CoL
( Huber 2010a: 633; Boutet et al. 2020: 607).
caillati
View in CoL
,
Lima
View in CoL
– Deshayes, 1858-DescrCoqFoss: 82, pl. 78, figs 5-8; 1861-DescrCoqFoss: 66-67. — Type locality: Thiverval-Grignon. — Type age: Eocene (Lutetian). — Type material: UCBL-EM 35346, holotype. — Current status:
Lima ( Ctenoides) caillati Deshayes, 1858
View in CoL
( Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 84; Pacaud 2008: 83).
cordiformis
View in CoL
,
Lima
View in CoL
– Deshayes,1832-EncyMeth: 348-349;1836-HistNatAnim2: 123;
1843-HistNatAnim3: 48-49. — Type locality: Germany. — Type age: Muschelkalk, Triassic. — Current status: taxon inquirendum
.
diastropha
View in CoL
,
Lima
View in CoL
–Deshayes, 1858-DescrCoqFoss: 82, pl. 78, figs 12- 13; 1861-DescrCoqFoss: 66. — Type locality: Parnes. — Type age: Eocene (Lutetian). — Current status:
Lima ( Ctenoides) diastropha Deshayes, 1858
View in CoL
( Glibert & Van de Poel 1965b: 50; Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 84; Pacaud 2008: 83).
dujardinii
,
Lima
View in CoL
– Deshayes, 1832-EncyMeth: 353; 1836-HistNatAnim2: 121; 1843-HistNatAnim3: 47-48. — Type locality: Tours. — Type age: Cretaceous (Turonian). — Current status:
Lima dujardinii Deshayes, 1832
( Dhondt, 1985: 46).
flabelloides
View in CoL
,
Lima
View in CoL
– Deshayes, 1830-DescrCoqFoss: 296, 22, pl. 43, figs 6-8; 1832-EncyMeth: 347-348;1836-HistNatAnim2: 119-120; 1843-HistNatAnim3: 47;1860-DescrCoqFoss: 82, pl. 78, figs 14-15; 1861-DescrCoqFoss: 65. — Type locality: Valmondois. — Type age: Eocene (Bartonian). — Current status:
Lima ( Ctenoides) flabelloides Deshayes, 1858
View in CoL
( Glibert & Van de Poel 1965b: 50; Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 83).
lunularis,
Lima
View in CoL
– Deshayes, 1832-EncyMeth: 349; 1836-HistNatAnim2: 122; 1839-RegAnim: pl. 77, fig. 3, 3a-b, as
Plagiostoma
View in CoL
; 1843-HistNatAnim3: 48;
1850- TraitElem: 29, pl. 47, figs 18- 19. — Type localities: Caen & Bayeux. — Type age: Jurassic ( Bajocian). — Type material: UCBL-EM 35334, syntype.
Recorded
from the Jurassic of Great Britain ( H. B. Woodward 1894: 562)
.
pretiosa
,
Lima
View in CoL
–Deshayes, 1858-DescrCoqFoss: 82, pl. 78, figs 16-19; 1861-DescrCoqFoss: 64-65. — Type localities:Thiverval-Grignon & Chaumont-en-Vexin. — Type age: Eocene (Lutetian). — Current status:
Lima ( Ctenoides) pretiosa Deshayes, 1858
View in CoL
( Glibert & Van de Poel 1965b: 51; Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 83; Pacaud 2008: 83).
rara
View in CoL
,
Lima
View in CoL
– Deshayes, 1858-DescrCoqFoss: 82, pl. 78, figs 9-11; 1861-DescrCoqFoss: 64. — Type locality: Parnes. — Type age: Eocene (Lutetian).
Lima ( Ctenoides) rara Deshayes, 1858
View in CoL
( Glibert & Van de Poel 1965b: 51; Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 83; Pacaud 2008: 83).
sandbergeri
,
Lima
View in CoL
–Deshayes, 1858-DescrCoqFoss: 82, pl. 78, figs 23- 25; 1861-DescrCoqFoss: 67-68. — Type locality: Jeure. — Type age: Oligocene (Rupelian). — Current status:
Limaria ( Limatulella) sandbergeri (Deshayes, 1858)
( Glibert & Van de Poel 1965b: 49; R. Janssen 1979: 68-69; Lozouet
& Maestrati
2012a: 250, 252, fig. 159: 13-14, the last two as “1861”).
sowerbyi
,
Lima
View in CoL
–Deshayes, 1863: 30, non Geinitz, 1850.Based on
Lima squamosa G. B. Sowerby II, 1843
View in CoL
, var. — Type locality: La Réunion.— Type age: Recent. — Current status: synonym of
Lima vulgaris (Link, 1807)
View in CoL
[
Limaria
View in CoL
] ( Huber 2010a: 228, 632; Lutaenko et al. 2019: 203).
tenuis
View in CoL
,
Lima
View in CoL
–Deshayes, 1858-DescrCoqFoss: 82, pl. 78, figs 20-22; 1861-DescrCoqFoss: 67. — Type localities: Crouy & Le Guépelle. — Type age: Eocene (Bartonian).
Limatula ( Limatulella) tenuis (Deshayes, 1858) ( Glibert & Van de Poel 1965b: 49)
View in CoL
. — Current status:
Antarctolima tenuis (Deshayes, 1858) ( Le Renard & Pacaud 1995: 84)
.
uniauriculata,
Lima
View in CoL
– Deshayes,1832-EncyMeth: 350. — Type locality: none given. — Type age:not stated. — Current status: nomen
dubium
.
●
comata,
Lima
– Leymerie, 1841: 342, nomen nudum; 1842: 10, 26, pl. 8, fig. 7a-b, ex Deshayes ms. — Type locality: Vendeuvre-sur-Barse. — Type age: Cretaceous (Hauterivian).
hoperi
,
Lima
View in CoL
– Listed by Arkadiev (2020: 29, 192, pl. 45, fig. 8) as a Deshayes species, this originated as
Lima hoperi Mantell, 1822
.
pectinoides
View in CoL
,
Lima
View in CoL
– Deshayes, 1850-TraitElem: 29, pl. 48, fig. 3. Fossil. Listed by Sherborn (1929: 4805) as a Deshayes species, this was based on
Plagiostoma pectinoides J. Sowerby, 1815
View in CoL
.
striata
View in CoL
,
Lima
View in CoL
–Deshayes, 1850-TraitElem: 29, pl. 47, fig. 17. Listed by Sherborn (1931: 6183) as a Deshayes species, was based on
Chamites striatus Schlotheim, 1813
( Schlotheim 1813: 103), which has been variously placed in
Lima
View in CoL
or
Plagiostoma See
View in CoL
also Schlotheim (1820: 210-211). Both Schlotheim works cite earlier figures.
undata
,
Lima
View in CoL
– Leymerie, 1841: 342, nomen nudum; 1842: 10, 27, pl. 8, fig. 8a-b, ex Deshayes ms. — Type locality: Vendeuvre-sur-Barse. — Type age: Cretaceous (Hauterivian).
