Epeus kepayang, Dhiya’Ulhaq, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1015.3061 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1F8E2DCC-4649-4124-8544-ECD63DC69D24 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17227065 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2B0187A9-7868-AF0D-ED61-FECDFE690A1C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Epeus kepayang |
status |
|
Epeus kepayang Dhiya’ulhaq sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
Figs 10–13 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig
Diagnosis
Males of Epeus kepayang Dhiya’ulhaq sp. nov. are very similar to those of Epeus phamtri Tam & Hill, 2025 and Epeus hawigalboguttatus ( Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) by their genitalia but can be differentiated from the latter two species by a thumb-shaped tegular lobe arising at 4.30 position (vs narrowed in middle in E. phamtri [ Żabka 1985: fig. 109; Peng 2020: fig. 47a]; bent, arising at 6.00 position in E. hawigalboguttatus [see illustration of holotype in Prószyński 2016]); additionally from E. hawigalboguttatus by a triangular cymbial process (vs curved, claw-shaped). Females of E. kepayang are very similar to those of E. phamtri but can be distinguished by a longer than wide atrium ( Fig. 13A–D View Fig vs wider than long in E. phamtri [ Żabka 1985: figs 116–117, 119]); rather straight anterior (uncoiled) part of copulatory ducts (vs curved); proportionally smaller posterior (coiled) part of copulatory ducts, approximately one-third length of anterior part (vs half length of anterior part in E. phamtri ); and spermathecae not dorsally covered by copulatory ducts (vs covered).
Etymology
The specific epithet is taken from the local word ‘ kepayang ’, a local name for the tree Pangium edule Reinw. The seeds of kepayang trees are poisonous, but are used as spice for local dishes. The dark-brown face of the male Epeus kepayang sp. nov. resembles the inside of kepayang seeds. Noun in apposition.
Material examined
Holotype
INDONESIA – Jambi Province • ♂; Sarolangun, Bukit Duabelas National Park ; 1°56′30.8″ S, 102°34′50.6″ E; elev. 91 m; 4 Oct. 2013; J. Drescher leg.; canopy fogging in rainforest; GOET 2013_ BF4.2_AraSalt101N_001 (to be transferred to MZB). GoogleMaps
Paratypes
INDONESIA – Jambi Province • 1 ♂; same data as for holotype; GOET 2013_BF4.2_AraSalt101N_001 (to be deposited at MZB) GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; Sarolangun, Pauh, Semaran ; 2°08′35.9″ S, 102°51′04.5″ E; elev. 45 m; 16 Jul. 2013; J. Drescher leg.; canopy fogging in jungle rubber plantation; GOET 2013_BJ5.1_ AraSalt101N_001 (to be transferred to MZB) GoogleMaps • 2 ♂♂; Batang Hari, Hutan Harapan Conservation Area ; 2°09′09.3″ S, 103°21′41.8″ E; elev. 65 m; 19 Jul. 2013; J. Drescher leg.; canopy fogging in rainforest; ZMH ZMH-A0031813, ZMH-A0031814 GoogleMaps • 2 ♀♀; Batang Hari, Hutan Harapan Conservation Area ; 2°11′15.3″ S, 103°20′36.0″ E; elev. 69 m; 12 Sep. 2013; J. Drescher leg.; canopy fogging in rainforest; ZMH ZMH-A0031815, ZMH-A0031816 GoogleMaps .
Description
Male ( Figs 10–11 View Fig View Fig )
MEASUREMENTS. Total length 7.54. Carapace length 3.42; width 2.86. Opisthosoma length 4.12; width 1.74. Diameter of eyes: AME 0.87; ALE 0.35; PLE 0.34. Interdistances between eyes: AME–AME 0.04; AME–ALE 0.06; ALE–ALE 1.46; ALE–PLE 0.94; PLE–PLE 1.58. Clypeus height 0.22. Leg measurements: leg I 9.13 (2.63, 1.00, 2.67, 1.86, 0.97); leg II 9.45 (3.07, 0.86, 2.17, 2.38, 0.97); leg III 8.94 (2.76, 1.07, 2.35, 1.79, 0.97); leg IV 8.72 (2.60, 0.76, 2.21, 2.30, 0.85).
HABITUS AND COLORATION. Carapace with high cephalic region; thoracic region yellow, gently sloping, posteriorly rounded; frontal side dark-brown; clypeus covered by white setae; eye region reddish-brown, posteriorly with erect red setae as well as white setae between ALE and PLE. Chelicerae dark-brown with purple-blue iridescence; dentition: promarginal absent, one retromarginal. Opisthosoma elongated, uniformly yellow; spinnerets black. Legs I and II predominantly dark-brown except yellow dorsal side of tibia, patella and basal half of femora; lateral side of tibia additionally with purple-blue iridescence; distal of metatarsus with dense brush of black setae, as well as along ventral side of femora. Spinnerets black, tips pale.
PALP ( Fig. 11 View Fig ). Tibia length-to-width ratio 1.30. RTA tapering, directed retrolaterally, apex slightly curved. Cymbium elongated, distally narrowed; cymbial process triangular. Tegulum oval, slightly oblique; tegular lobe thumb-shaped, arising at 4.30 position. Embolus long filiform, almost reaching apex of cymbium, arising at 7:00 position.
Female ( Figs 12–13 View Fig View Fig )
MEASUREMENTS. Total length 7.34. Carapace length 2.93; width 2.37. Opisthosoma length 4.41; width 2.48. Diameter of eyes: AME 0.78; ALE 0.29; PLE 0.29. Interdistances between eyes: AME–AME 0.03; AME–ALE 0.05; ALE–ALE 1.51; ALE–PLE 0.81; PLE–PLE 1.38. Clypeus height 0.14. Leg measurements: leg I 6.75 (1.99, 0.76, 2.03, 1.26, 0.71); leg II 6.89 (2.14, 0.76, 1.90, 1.31, 0.78); leg III 7.74 (2.53, 0.76, 1.68, 1.82, 0.95); leg IV 7.37 (2.26, 0.63, 1.88, 1.85, 0.75).
HABITUS AND COLORATION. Female habitus as in male, except following: base color of carapace and chelicerae uniformly yellow, erect hairs absent; cheliceral dentition: one promarginal, two retromarginal; legs all yellow, with small brown patches on tibiae-femora of leg I and II.
EPIGYNUM ( Fig. 13 View Fig ). Epigynal plate triangular. Copulatory openings facing each other, creating narrow, longer than wide atrium. Copulatory ducts long and convoluted; anterior part rather straight and oblique, ending in a u-turn posterior part consisting of three loops, ending in u-turn towards spermathecae. Spermathecae thumb-shaped, not dorsally covered by copulatory ducts, medially positioned. Fertilization ducts arising from anterior region of spermathecae, laterally oriented.
Distribution
Sumatra: Jambi Province.
Natural history
All specimens were collected by canopy fogging in rainforests and jungle rubber plantations and are considered arboreal.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |