Lespedeza junghuhniana Bakh.f.
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2019.64.03.07 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/316987B7-0B69-FFE0-FCC1-FBB1FBDCF9F2 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Lespedeza junghuhniana Bakh.f. |
| status |
|
2. Lespedeza junghuhniana Bakh.f. View in CoL
Lespedeza junghuhniana Bakh.f.(1961) 134;Backer & Bakh.f.(1964) 613. — Phlebosporium cytisoides Jungh. (1845) 346; Hassk. (1847) 508. — Lespedeza cytisoides (Jungh.) Benth. (1852) 230, nom. superfl., non Bertol. (1851: 278). — Campylotropis cytisoides (Jungh.) Miq. (1855) 229, t. 4, f. a; Iokawa & H.Ohashi (2002a) 210. — Type: Junghuhn 77 (n.v.), Java.
Notes — 1. When Phlebosporium cytisoides was placed by Bentham (1852) in Lespedeza the name Lespedeza cytisoides Bertol. (1851) already existed. A new name was required. Bakhuizen van den Brink Jr. (1961) proposed to replace it by Lespedeza junghuhniana .
2. Iokawa & Ohashi (2002a) gave Campylotropis virgata Miq. as a synonym of Lespedeza junghuhniana . However, the specimens described by Miquel are different in several characters. Miquel’s specimens belong to Lespedeza cyrtobotrya Miq. (see Excluded species).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.