Meligethes ( Meligethes ) cinereoargenteus Audisio, Sabatelli & Jelínek, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4392.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B6592836-2F1E-4B9D-9DD0-CF2BBA2C1CC3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5967051 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/144587D0-8109-7273-42A0-D09E447AE612 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Meligethes ( Meligethes ) cinereoargenteus Audisio, Sabatelli & Jelínek, 2015 |
status |
|
Meligethes ( Meligethes) cinereoargenteus Audisio, Sabatelli & Jelínek, 2015
Examined material. China, SICHUAN, LUDINg COUNTY, MOXI TOWN, MT . GONggA, HAILUOgOU, 2780 m A.S.L., CA. 29.566667° 102°, 5.v.2017, X. CHEN LgT, 3 ♂, 4 ♀ (NWAU, CAR-MZUR, NMPC).
Distribution. SW CHINA ( SICHUAN); KNOWN THUS fAR ONLY fROm SICHUAN, ON THE bASIS Of TWO SERIOUSLY DAmAgED mALE SpECImENS COLLECTED NEAR LUDINg (AUDISIO et al. 2015) ( FIg. 5b View FIGURE 5 ).
Host-plants. UNKNOWN; HOWEvER, THE HOST IS LIKELY Rosa Sp. OR A RELATED ROSACEAE gENUS . THIS SpECIES OCCURS IN bUSHY/SHRUbbY AREAS AT HIgH ALTITUDES ( 2500–2800 m).
Taxonomic remarks. DUE TO THE pOOR STATE Of pRESERvATION Of THE TYpE mATERIAL fROm LUDINg, THIS SpECIES, ALTHOUgH bEINg ONLY SUpERfICIALLY SImILAR TO Meligethes ( M.) nepalensis EASTON, 1968, fROm NEpAL (IN THE Meligethes nepalensis SpECIES gROUp), WAS mISINTERpRETED bY AUDISIO et al. (2015) AS bELONgINg TO THIS CLADE. BASED ON THE fRESH mATERIAL REpORTED AbOvE ( FIg. 1C View FIGURE 1 ), THIS TAXON IS DEfINITIvELY A mEmbER Of THE Meligethes auripilis SpECIES gROUp, AND CAN bE NOW TRANSfERRED TO THIS CLADE, AND AppARENTLY RELATED TO M. aurifer (fROm E SHAANXI AND W SHANXI) AND M. aureolineatus (fROm N SICHUAN). THESE THREE TAXA fORm THE HERE ESTAbLISHED M. aurifer SpECIES COmpLEX. Meligethes cinereoargenteus IS WELL-CHARACTERIZED bY ITS DISTINCTIvE mALE gENITALIA, SpECIfICALLY A pECULIARLY SHApED AEDEAgAL ApEX (FIgS. 7I, J IN AUDISIO et al. 2015). THE STRONgLY EXpANDED mALE pROTARSI ALSO DIffERENTIATE THIS SpECIES ( FIg. 1C View FIGURE 1 ). THE pREvIOUSLY UNKNOWN OvIpOSITOR Of THIS SpECIES IS NOT CONSIDERAbLY DIffERENT IN ITS gENERAL SHApE fROm THAT Of M. aurifer , bUT DOES EXHIbIT A SHALLOWER ApICAL EXCISION Of THE COmbINED gONOCOXAL ApICES ( FIg. 2L View FIGURE 2 ); RATIO OVPL/GONL = 2.25. FEmALES DIffER fROm mALES mAINLY bY THE mUCH NARROWER pROTARSAL pLATES (RATIO WFTA/LFTA = 0.33 IN fEmALES AND = 0.45 IN mALES), AND bY THE mUCH SHALLOWER ImpRESSION ON THE pOSTERIOR pORTION Of THE mETAvENTRITE.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |