Neoconocephalus curitibensis Piza, 1952

Neoconocephalus curitibensis Piza, 1952 View in CoL

( Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 , 6 View FIGURE 6 , 17 View FIGURE 17 )

Neoconocephalus curitibensis Piza, 1952 View in CoL . Piza Jr. (1952): 246 [Description]; Paschoal & Barros (1977): 241 [Catalog]; Chamorro-Rengifo & Braun (2010): 43 [Catalog].

Neoconocephalus rioclarensis Piza, 1975 View in CoL . Piza Jr. (1975): 355 [Description]; Chamorro-Rengifo & Braun (2010): 43 [Catalog]; Fianco, Szinwelski & Faria (2022):17 [Record]; Fianco (2023):1099 [Record]. syn. nov. ( Fig. 5 A–I View FIGURE 5 )

Type locality. Curitiba , Paraná, Brazil .

Diagnosis. Robust body ( Figs. 5A, B, I, J View FIGURE 5 , 6A, B View FIGURE 6 ); head oval in frontal view ( Figs. 5E, N View FIGURE 5 , 6E View FIGURE 6 ); fastigium of vertex semicircular in frontal view, two and a half times longer than scapus length, base three and half times wider than scapus width ( Figs. 5C, D, E, L, M, N View FIGURE 5 , 6C, D, E View FIGURE 6 ); pronotum lateral lobe longer than wide ( Figs. 5C, L View FIGURE 5 , 6C View FIGURE 6 ).

Redescription. Head: Oval in frontal view ( Figs. 5E, N View FIGURE 5 , 6E View FIGURE 6 ); fastigium of vertex semicircular in frontal view, two and a half times longer than scapus length, base three and a half times larger than scapus width, tooth projected at basal portion of fastigium ( Figs. 5C, D, E, L, M, N View FIGURE 5 , 6C, D, E View FIGURE 6 ); fastigium of frons projected, rounded ( Figs. 5E, N View FIGURE 5 , 6E View FIGURE 6 ). Thorax: Pronotum anterior margin almost straight and posterior margin slightly convex ( Figs. 5D, M View FIGURE 5 , 6D View FIGURE 6 ); lateral lobe longer than wide, anterior margin of lateral lobe almost straight followed by a smooth curve with lower margin almost straight, margin of humeral sinus very rounded and very marked, invagination of humeral sinus in an open V-shaped ( Figs. 5C, L View FIGURE 5 , 6C View FIGURE 6 ). Wings: Tegmen with basal and apical region equally wide ( Figs. 5B, K View FIGURE 5 , 6B View FIGURE 6 ). Legs: Foreleg genicular lobe little developed and triangular, tympanum with three distinct regions: proximal one circular and closed, median one with a pair of open longitudinal slits, and apical one circular and open; midleg with femur with two ventral small spines, genicular lobe little developed with inner side with acute apex and outer side with rounded apex, tibia with approximately six pairs of ventral spines; hindleg femur ventrally with 10 inner spines and six outer spines, genicular lobe little developed, tibia dorsally with approximately 17 inner spines and 21 outer spines, in addition two pairs of spurs, ventrally with seven pairs of spines. Color : Living specimens green with apical region of tegmen yellowish green or brown. Type and additional specimens green or brown; black on ventral surface of tarsi, joints of legs, and frontal area of the fastigium of vertex.

Description of male. Tegmen: Stridulatory area with two distinct elevated transverse regions, anterior one long with median furrow and posterior one with a small callous projection ( Figs. 5F View FIGURE 5 , 6F View FIGURE 6 ). Cercus : dorsal lobe with spine measuring one third the length of lobe, ventral lobe two times longer than dorsal lobe ( Figs. 5G, H View FIGURE 5 , 6G, H View FIGURE 6 ).

Description of female. Subgenital plate: Posterior margin deeply concave and with pair of triangular projections ( Fig. 5O View FIGURE 5 ). Ovipositor: Slightly extending beyond tegmen apex ( Fig. 5K View FIGURE 5 ).

Measurements: Female holotype: BdL 33.7(35.0); FL 2.4(2.0); PdL 9.8(10.0); TegL 51.6(51.0); FlegL 9.2; HlegL 28.7(28.0); OvL 38.3(36.0). Females (n=3): BdL 28.1–33.3; FL 2.1–2.6; PdL 9.2–9.8; TegL 48.3–50.1; FlegL 8.7–9.3; HlegL 26.5–27.9; OvL 36.9–39.1. Males (n=11): BdL 26.4–27.2; FL 1.5–1.8; PdL 8.8–9.2; TegL 41.8–44.3; FlegL 6.2–7.0; HlegL 22.0–22.4.

Distribution. Minas Gerais [new record], Paraná, Rio de Janeiro [new record], and São Paulo states.

Taxonomic notes. This species is most similar with N. cylindricus ( Karny, 1907) , N. dispar ( Karny, 1907) , and N. exaltatus ( Walker, 1869) . However, N. curitibensis can be distinguished from N. cylindricus by its pronotum lateral lobe with sinus humeral rounded and very marked ( Figs. 5C, L View FIGURE 5 , 6C View FIGURE 6 ) and ovipositor extending beyond tegmen apex ( Fig. 5K View FIGURE 5 ) (sinus humeral concave and ovipositor not reaching the tegmen in N. cylindricus ); from N. dispar by presence of space between fastigium of vertex and fastigium of frons ( Figs. 5C, L View FIGURE 5 , 6C View FIGURE 6 ) and tegmen with basal and apical equally wide ( Figs. 5B, K View FIGURE 5 , 6B View FIGURE 6 ) (space between fastigium of vertex and fastigium of frons absent and tegmen with apical region narrower than basal region in N. dispar ); and from N. exaltatus by the pronotum lateral lobe with smooth curvature between anterior and lower margin ( Figs. 5C, L View FIGURE 5 , 6C View FIGURE 6 ) and stridulatory area with anterior elevated region measuring one third of tegmen width ( Fig. 5F View FIGURE 5 ) (pronotum lateral lobe with sharp curvature between anterior and lower margin and stridulatory area with anterior elevated region measuring half of tegmen width in N. exaltatus ).

The male holotype of N. rioclarensis syn. nov. is herein considered conspecific to N. curitibensis . Observing the type material of two species, important diagnostic similarities were observed, such as, robust body, being one of the largest Neoconocephalus species ( Figs. 5A, B, J, K View FIGURE 5 , 6A, B View FIGURE 6 ); oval head, in frontal view ( Figs. 5E, N View FIGURE 5 , 6E View FIGURE 6 ); similar sized fastigium of vertex base width and fastigium of vertex length ( Figs. 5C, D, E, L, M, N View FIGURE 5 , 6C, D, E View FIGURE 6 ); and thorax notoriously wider in comparison with the rest of the body ( Figs. 5A, J View FIGURE 5 , 6A View FIGURE 6 ). Additionally, the male holotype of N. rioclarensis syn. nov. shares with identified males of N. curitibensis the same number and disposition of elevated regions on the stridulatory area ( Figs. 5F View FIGURE 5 , 6F View FIGURE 6 ).

Type material. Neoconocephalus curitibensis : female holotype “Curitiba; Or. Curiol II.45” [ MELQ]. Neoconocephalus rioclarensis syn. nov.: male holotype “ Dr. Amilto Ferreira leg.; Rio Claro (S.P.); 10-X-70” [ MELQ] .

Additional material. Females: One female “ Brasil, PR, Antonina, RPPN Guaricica, Trilha dos fornos, 167m; 25.298S 48.657W; 4.II.2022; H. Barros leg. [ DZUP 367122 View Materials ]. GoogleMaps One female “ Brasil, SP, Biritiba Mirim, Estação Biológica de Boracéia ; 12–16.X.2016; Souza-Dias & equipe legs.” [ MNRJ-ENT6-32129 ]. One female “Viçosa, MG, Brasil; 13/12/84; P.S. Fiuza F. leg.” [ UFVB]. Males : One male “ Brasil, RJ, Itatiaia , BR485 ; 13/X/2013; Rede de varredura; Takiya et al. legs” [ DZRJ ORT0673 ]. One male “ Brasil, RJ, Itatiaia, PNI, Trilha do lago azul; 27/ IX/2019; Antunes et al. legs” [ DZRJ ORT1171 ]. One male “ Brasil, RJ, Itatiaia, PNI, Propriedade perto do lago azul; 25–28.X.2019; Malaise; Antunes et al. legs” [ DZRJ ORT1356 ]. One male “ Brasil, PR, Antonina, Res. Nat. Guaricica, Trilha da Rede. 06–20.VII.2018; Malaise suspensa; G.A. R. Melo & R. Cavichioli legs.” [ DZUP 367116 View Materials ]. Four males “ Brasil, SP, Biritiba Mirim, Estação Biológica de Boraceia; 12–16.X.2016; Souza-Dias & equipe leg.” [ MNRJ-ENT6-32107 , MNRJ-ENT6-32130 , MNRJ-ENT6-32131 , MNRJ-ENT6-32132 ]. Two males “Viçosa. MG; 13/10/87; Exc. DB1 leg” [ UFVB]. One male “Viçosa, M.G. Brasil; 20.3.63; Vanetti leg.” [ UFVB].