Rubus obscuras, Kaltenb.
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.293200 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B0402C-FFEB-E342-F8A3-F593DC95F038 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Rubus obscuras |
| status |
|
58. R. obscuras Kaltenb. View in CoL , FI. Aachen. Beck. 2: 281 (1844).
Stems robust, with blunt angles, densely pubescent with long hairs, glandular, purple, glaucescent; prickles unequal, long, patent or falcate, bright red. Leaves pedate, more or less greywhite tomentose beneath; leaflets 3-5, glabrous above, becoming convex; terminal leaflet elliptic-obovate, acuminate, subcuneate and nearly entire at base; petioles short, with straight prickles. Inflorescence large and compound, pyramidal, the lower branches long and many-flowered; axis densely pubescent, with numerous sunken glands; prickles short, fine, straight, yellowish. Sepals erecto-patent in fruit, green, tomentose, glandular, aculeolate, appendiculate; petals narrow, deep pink; stamens white or pink, slightly exceeding the pink styles; receptacle and carpels pubescent. 2/7 = 28. N. W. & C. Europe. Au Be Br Cz Ga Ge He Ho Hu Po. Related species include:
R. castaneifolius Sabr., Mitt. Naturw. Ver. Steierm. 52: 289 (1916). Au.
R. cruentatus P. J. Mueller ex Focke , Syn. Rub. Germ. 312 (1877). Au Be Br Da Ga Ge.
R. entomodontos P. J. Mueller ex Focke, loc. cit. (1877). Br CzGa.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Rubus obscuras
| Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Moore, D. M., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M. & Webb, D. A. 1981 |
R. obscuras
| Kaltenb. 1844: 281 |