Sida cuneifolia Roxb., Fl. Ind.
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2021.31.02.12 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0B6E420D-AE76-FFBE-10DF-FC5BFB8D2086 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Sida cuneifolia Roxb., Fl. Ind. |
| status |
|
Sida cuneifolia Roxb., Fl. Ind. 3: 170. 1832.
Lectotype (designated here): Sida cuneifolia Roxb. drawing in Icones Roxburghianae no. 341 (K digital image!). Fig. 1 View Fig
Notes: The name S. cuneifolia was proposed by Roxburgh (1832), in ‘ Flora Indica’. According to Stafleu and Cowan (1983) Roxburgh’s specimens and types are known to be placed at BM, BR, E, G, K and LIV; small set at B (Willd), C, DBN, E, FI, NY, OXF, P, PH, UPS (Thunb.). Stafleu and Cowan (1983) also stated that Roxburgh’s drawings are of great importance for the typification of Roxburgh’s species. As Roxburgh’s collection or specimens referred for description could not be traced for the name S. cuneifolia , Roxburgh’s drawing with ‘Roxburgh number 341’ is referred to study as an original material which depicts the characters mentioned in the protologue, and it is designated here as lectotype.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Genus |
Sida cuneifolia Roxb., Fl. Ind.
| V. V., Nimbalkar, G. M., Tambde & Sardesai, M. M. 2021 |
Sida cuneifolia
| Roxb., Fl. Ind. 1832: 170 |