Tetragonoschema ( Tetragonoschema ) rubromarginatum Théry, 1944
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3521.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9E2E5303-FBEA-44F7-92D4-05B2E608EB25 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5911752 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/833687D8-FC50-0C47-C494-FAC00413F5A9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tetragonoschema ( Tetragonoschema ) rubromarginatum Théry, 1944 |
status |
|
Tetragonoschema ( Tetragonoschema) rubromarginatum Théry, 1944 View in CoL
( Figs. 25 View FIGURES 19 – 27 , 51 View FIGURES 46 – 54 , 75 View FIGURES 72 – 81 )
Tetragonoschema rubromarginatum Théry, 1944: 22 View in CoL . Type locality: Argentina, Chaco de Santiago del Estero, Bords du Rio Salado, env. d´Icaño.
Tetragonoschema rubromarginatum: Bellamy, 2008: 1520 View in CoL (catalogue).
Type specimens studied. Number of syntypes unknown; lectotype ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 19 – 27 ), here designated ( male, MFCB): “ Argentina, Rio Salado [h] // Tetragonoschema cupreomarginatum [sic!] Théry [h] paratype [p]” ; paralectotype, here designated (female, MNHN): “Museum Paris, [ Argentina] Chaco de Santiago del Estero, Bords du Rio Salado, env. d´Icaño, 1910, E. R. Wagner [p] // rubromarginatum Théry [h] Type [p]”.
Further specimens studied. ARGENTINA. CHUBUT: Desembocadura Río Chubut, 20.i.–7.ii.2011, D. Rojas Lanus leg. ( 3 males, MDCS) ; FORMOSA: La Rioja, Alparinche, 30.xii.2002, L. A. Stange leg. ( 1 male, FSCA) ; Mendoza, San Carlos Arroyo, El Yaucha, 1450 m, 21.i.1979, Sergio Roig leg., on Grindelia flowers ( 1 female, MDCS).
Diagnosis. Rather large, length: 5.2–6.5 mm, stout with bicolorous elytra: blue-black or blue-violet, completely margined with red or golden-red; frons with rather long, pronotum with very short, white pubescence; pronotum regularly convex without lateroposterior depressions, elytra flat with deep and wide discal depressions; elytral epipleura wide, reaching elytral suture, easily visible from above; aedeagus very short and stout, parameres with preapical spines ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 72 – 81 ). In its colouration resembling T. ( T.) cupreocingulatum , T. ( T.) humerale and T. ( T.) trinidadanse but it differs from them strongly in the form of the elytral epipleura, pronotal shape and in the form of male genitalia.( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 72 – 81 vs. Figs. 78, 80, 81 View FIGURES 72 – 81 ).
As the number of syntypes is unknown I hereby designate the male from MFCB as the lectotype and the female from MNHN as the paralectotype of T. rubromarginatum .
Bionomy. A female from Mendoza was collected on flower of Grindelia sp. ( Asteraceae ).
Sexual dimorphism. The female differs from the male only in the larger and stouter body.
Distribution. Argentina
Note. One male from Chubut possesses completely red elytra with a golden margin.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Tetragonoschema |
Tetragonoschema ( Tetragonoschema ) rubromarginatum Théry, 1944
Bílý, Svatopluk 2012 |
Tetragonoschema rubromarginatum :
Bellamy 2008: 1520 |
Tetragonoschema rubromarginatum Théry, 1944: 22
Thery 1944: 22 |